By J.E.
I’ve been meaning to see Vanity Fair ever since it came out in 2004, but for one reason or another, I didn’t get around to it until last night. The movie is of course based on the William Makepeace Thackeray novel of the same name, a novel that I’ve read — and enjoyed — twice. That’s no small feat considering it’s a 900+ page tome! Anyway, my excitement and anticipation for the movie increased greatly when I heard that Reese Witherspoon would be playing Becky Sharp. I couldn’t wait to see what she would do with the character.
As with any adaptation, there are bound to be differences from the original material. My review isn’t going to focus on these differences; instead, I’m going to consider the movie on its own.
Vanity Fair focuses on Becky Sharp, a young woman with no fortune and no family who is left to try to make her own way in the world. She leaves finishing school with a single friend, Amelia Sedley (played by Romola Garai) and not much else. Becky goes to stay with Amelia for a few days, immediately setting her sights on Amelia’s brother Joseph. Right from the start we see that Becky intends to marry well so that she will be taken care of.
Anyway, Jos is bound for India and Becky thinks he would make a suitable husband. Amelia encourages the match because she truly likes Becky and would love to have her as a sister. But Amelia’s own betrothed, Captain George Osborne, does not want a low-class girl in his family so he tells Jos not to even think about Becky anymore. Jos gives up and heads off to India by himself.
There’s nothing left for Becky to do except earn her keep as a governess. She accepts a post at the Crawley residence, where she meets Sir Pitt, his sons Pitt and Rawdon, and his rich sister Matilda. Matilda takes an instant liking to Becky, and brings her away from Crawley Hall as her companion. These good feelings change, however, when Becky discloses that she has secretly married Rawdon. That news is not well received, and Becky is kicked out of Ms. Crawley’s house while Rawdon is disinherited.
The two live genuinely seem to love each other, so they don’t mind living in relative poverty. Rawdon is a gambler and his winnings provide them with just enough. Becky manages the household and uses her charms to get credit from local merchants. But one day their money runs out completely, and just when their furniture is about to be taken away, Lord Steyne steps in to save the day.
Lord Steyne not only pays their debts, but invites them to social functions at his home, which serves to restore their place in society. Of course his attentions don’t come without a price. He demands sexual favors from Becky, and when Rawdon finds out, he takes their son and leaves her.
More than a decade later, we see Becky working as a casino girl in Germany. One day Jos Sedley comes in and says that he’s there to rectify the mistake he made all those years ago. They go off to India together where they presumably live on as husband and wife.
Through it all, Amelia has her own storyline that deals with George, George’s falling out with his father, the upbringing of their child, and her relationship with George’s friend Dobbin.
My Reaction: I found that I enjoyed this film a great deal. Yes, it was very long and actually rather boring in some parts, but I thought Witherspoon’s performance made the whole thing worth it. Her take on Becky Sharp is quite different than how the character is presented in the novel. Here, Witherspoon’s Becky, while still an obvious social climber, isn’t quite so heartless or cold as in the book. She has many redeeming qualities and gives off the feeling of being an underdog rather than a ruthless schemer.
The supporting cast was great, too. I thought James Purefoy was excellent as Rawdon, as was Jonathan Rhys-Meyers as George. The actors made me want to pay attention even when the plot was a bit lacking in tension or excitement.
Overall, I thought this was a good film. It’s not quite the adaptation that I thought it would be and didn’t follow the book as closely as I would have liked, but judging on its own merits I give it 7.0 stars out of 10.