<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burn Notice 1&#215;04</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reviewsandmore.net/2007/07/20/burn-notice-1x04/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reviewsandmore.net/2007/07/20/burn-notice-1x04/</link>
	<description>Reviews of movies, TV shows, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:16:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.E.</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsandmore.net/2007/07/20/burn-notice-1x04/comment-page-1/#comment-9250</link>
		<dc:creator>J.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsandmore.net/2007/07/20/burn-notice-1x04/#comment-9250</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you&#039;re the real Seth Peterson from Burn Notice, but I wanted
to reply to your comment anyway since you took the time to visit my site.

The reason I don’t like Fiona is that her character doesn&#039;t add anything
good to the show right now.

Is she there to create sexual tension? If so, I don’t think it’s working.
She and Michael have zero chemistry onscreen and her persistent advances
despite Michael’s rejections just make her look needy.

Is she there as a spy buddy? That could work, as she’s proven that she’s
handy out in the field. But I wish the writers would just let her be a spy
instead of making her have a romantic agenda where Michael is concerned.

There have been some great female TV characters who showed they could play
with the boys without having to strut their sexuality first. Scully from
The X-Files. Lily Rush on Cold Case. Hell, even Sharon Gless as Cagney
back in the day.

If Fiona could be more like them, I’d have no problem with her!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re the real Seth Peterson from Burn Notice, but I wanted<br />
to reply to your comment anyway since you took the time to visit my site.</p>
<p>The reason I don’t like Fiona is that her character doesn&#8217;t add anything<br />
good to the show right now.</p>
<p>Is she there to create sexual tension? If so, I don’t think it’s working.<br />
She and Michael have zero chemistry onscreen and her persistent advances<br />
despite Michael’s rejections just make her look needy.</p>
<p>Is she there as a spy buddy? That could work, as she’s proven that she’s<br />
handy out in the field. But I wish the writers would just let her be a spy<br />
instead of making her have a romantic agenda where Michael is concerned.</p>
<p>There have been some great female TV characters who showed they could play<br />
with the boys without having to strut their sexuality first. Scully from<br />
The X-Files. Lily Rush on Cold Case. Hell, even Sharon Gless as Cagney<br />
back in the day.</p>
<p>If Fiona could be more like them, I’d have no problem with her!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.reviewsandmore.net/2007/07/20/burn-notice-1x04/comment-page-1/#comment-9247</link>
		<dc:creator>seth peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reviewsandmore.net/2007/07/20/burn-notice-1x04/#comment-9247</guid>
		<description>hey, thanx for the kind words bro. Im glad u liked me as Nate, but why the fiona bashathon? wheres the love lol. Seth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, thanx for the kind words bro. Im glad u liked me as Nate, but why the fiona bashathon? wheres the love lol. Seth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

