By J.E.
Plot summary (with possible spoilers): Fourteen-year-old Susie Salmon (played by Saoirse Ronan) is murdered on her way home from school one day in the winter of 1973. The girl’s spirit then gets stuck in an “in-between” place as she comes to terms with what happened to her. While there, Susie can see how her family, friends, and killer cope with the aftermath of her death.
Father Jack (Mark Wahlberg), mother Abigail (Rachel Weisz), sister Lindsey (Rose McIver), and grandmother Lynn (Susan Sarandon) all react in completely different ways to Susie’s death. Jack is the one who never gives up hope of finding Susie’s killer. He becomes obsessed with tracking down clues and making sure that Detective Len Fenerman (Michael Imperioli) is looking at particular suspects. It’s clear that he has the hardest time accepting what happened.
Abigail’s grief takes a much quieter, internal form. She withdraws from her family both emotionally and physically, eventually moving away to California to do her own thing. Lindsey empathizes with Jack, and though she continues to live her life, she also proves pivotal in uncovering evidence of the killing. Grandma Lynn breezes in and pretends that nothing bothers her. She smokes, drinks, and curses as usual, hoping to numb everyone else’s pain by carrying on business as usual.
Meanwhile, the killer, a neighbor named George Harvey (Stanley Tucci), slowly feels the pressure of the Salmon family’s inquiries closing in on him. He initially fends off the cops, but is unable to shake Jack and Lindsey so easily. Once Lindsey breaks into his house and finds proof of the deed, Harvey has no choice but to flee the community.
As Susie watches, she sees that her family finally gets the closure they need in order to move on with their lives. Mr. Harvey was never caught by the authorities, but he gets his just desserts in the end, and once Susie realizes that everything is going to work out, she can finally pass into her heaven.
My Reaction: I read the Alice Sebold novel prior to seeing this film, so I already knew what the story was about. I’m glad I had that background, because I’m not sure I would have been able to decipher the movie version otherwise. It’s just as jumbled as the book, and there are so many different things going on that it’s hard to process everything and make sense of it all after a single viewing. Good luck to those who are going in cold!
I liked the murder plot more than the heaven/afterlife stuff. I thought Stanley Tucci’s performance was positively riveting, and I was immediately on the edge of my seat whenever he was on screen. He was so damn creepy (without being a caricature) that it practically made my skin crawl. I wish the movie had veered from the book in this respect and focused on him a lot more.
Speaking of the film veering from the book, I’m glad a couple of things were left out, such as Susie’s ridiculous reappearance in Ruth’s body so she could spend the day having sex with Ray. Yes, I know she comes back for a kiss in the movie, but that was much easier to take than the long, drawn-out scene in the book. Also, I’m thankful they left out the mom’s affair with Len Fenerman. That would have felt just as out of place on screen as in the book, and wouldn’t have added anything at all to the plot.
Overall, I can’t say that I was exactly disappointed by The Lovely Bones. I didn’t particularly like the original book, so I guess I was hoping the film would be significantly different enough to come off as a better story. It wasn’t. But some of the performances are damn good, which made the whole thing relatively easy to sit through. I give this film 6 stars out of 10.