Plot summary (with possible spoilers): In a “post-Apocalyptic” world, the only living beings seem to be animated ragdolls — which Wikipedia tells me are called “Stitchpunks”, though I’m pretty sure that term was never used in the film. The Stitchpunks don’t have names, but are distinguished from each other by numbers on their backs. The action mostly revolves around 9 (voiced by Elijah Wood), a relative newcomer to the rest of the team.
9 first learns of the existence of other Stitchpunks when he meets 2 (Martin Landau). 2 gives 9 a voice box, but is then pursued and captured by a robotic “cat beast”. 9 is then rescued by 5 (John C. Reilly), and the two of them then set out to help recover 2. Along the way, they meet up with 7 (Jennifer Connelly) and learn a little bit about what happened to make the world the way it is now. It turns out that a scientist (Alan Oppenheimer) created an intelligent machine that was supposed to help mankind, but an evil dictator took control of the machine and used it to try to take over the world. The subsequent wars resulted in the widespread devastation the Stitchpunks now see.
There is still hope of returning the world to its former glory, however. The Scientist put a bit of his soul into each of the nine Stitchpunks and created an amulet that could be used to destroy the Fabrication Machine should such action be necessary. 9 learns of this from watching a how-to tutorial, and then shares his knowledge withi the remaining Stitchpunks. 1 (Christopher Plummer) sacrifices himself so the amulet can be recovered, which results in the destruction of the Fabrication Machine. The film ends with a new rainfall, which seems to indicate that life on the planet will begin again.
Liked:
- Hmm, I guess I liked the fact that this film was only 79 minutes long and therefore wasn’t quite as torturous as it might have been.
Disliked:
- The storyline took far too long to develop. Why did audiences have to wait until the middle of the film to find out what the Stitchpunks were and what they were trying to do? That sort of thing is usually spelled out in the first 15 minutes or so. The only reason I kept watching this was that it was Family Movie Night and my 7-year-old chose this title.
- The lack of dialogue was annoying. I hate just watching endless action scenes, so the beginning of this film sucked for me and I spent most of it on my netbook writing a review for something I bought from fatburner.org. (I felt the same about Wall-E, BTW.)
- Did anyone actually care about the Stitchpunks? They weren’t developed as characters — despite having distinguishing characteristics, which is a completely different thing. I felt no connection to these things, so I wasn’t invested in their success nor was I affected by their “deaths”.
Rating:
9 just wasn’t my kind of movie at all. It was boring, hard to follow at the beginning, and lacking in any kind of interesting developments along the way. Since I base my ratings on how entertained I was and how likely I would be to see the film again, I give this 2 stars out of 5.
Well, the 2010 Emmy nominations are in, and I’m happy with them for the most part. I absolutely love that Modern Family garnered so many noms, especially in the acting categories. Five out of the 5 adult actors on the show received nods, but Ed O’Neill was absolutely robbed. He deserves recognition as well. I was also glad to see Sharon Gless get a nomination for her work on Burn Notice, as I think she’s great in that. And of course Jane Lynch needs to win for her performance as Sue Sylvester on Glee. She is the only reason to watch that show.
I have heard a ton of buzz about the AMC series Mad Men in the past couple years. It’s kind of impossible for a regular television viewer to miss the hype, since this series has won a number of Emmys (including Best Drama) and gets a lot of media coverage. But since I don’t ever watch AMC, I never bothered getting into the show.
Plot summary (with possible spoilers): Sixteen-year-old Miranda (played by Evan Rachel Wood) has been taking care of herself for years. Her father Charlie (Michael Douglas) spends his time in and out of mental institutions, while her mother disappeared a long time ago. Miranda manages to make ends meet by working at McDonald’s, and evades social services because of paperwork snafus that make it look like she’s always with one parent or the other.
I usually don’t enjoy action “blockbusters” to the extent that I want to run right out and buy them on DVD as soon as they’re available. I don’t mind sitting in the theater for a couple hours of mindless entertainment while I soak up the air conditioning and chow down on some popcorn, but these aren’t really the types of films that I’d go out of my way to own — except if we’re talking about the Bourne trilogy. This series, which consists of The Bourne Identity, The Bourne Supremacy, and The Bourne Ultimatum, is a great one, and each film should be watched several times to catch all the nuances that might have been missed the first time around.
Burn Notice 4×05 — “Neighborhood Watch”: This episode was only so-so for me. I found the OJotW to be interesting at times, but then completely boring and predictable at others. It’s a bad sign when the show can’t hold my full attention for the hour, and that’s precisely what happened when I started helping my cousin place an order for
Plot summary (with possible spoilers): Adrienne Willis (played by Diane Lane) has recently separated from her husband Jack (Christopher Meloni), and is trying to keep things together for teenage daughter Amanda (Mae Whitman) and 12-year-old Danny (Charlie Tahan). The situation gets more complicated when Jack tells Adrienne he wants to get back together. Adrienne isn’t sure she’s ready for that, and holds Jack off by saying she needs some time to think about everything.
I’m sure you’ve heard by now that Larry King will end his 25-year talk show run on CNN. He’s retiring in the fall so he can be around his family more, maybe finally buy that