Prior to my recent viewing of this film, I’d only seen The Wizard of Oz from beginning to end once in my life. This happened when I was a child, and though I didn’t remember too many specifics about the movie, I always thought about it as a classic along the lines of The Sound of Music: something that plays on television almost every year that can be easily enjoyed by the whole family. This time around, I decided to introduce the Wizard of Oz to my 8-year-old son just so he would have some inkling what the film was about.

As I might have expected, my son didn’t respond too well to The Wizard of Oz. In this day and age of Avatar and Transformers, Oz must seem incredibly cheesy to him. He was bored at the beginning; perked up a bit when the tornado struck; paid attention to some of the earlier scenes in Oz; and then ended up staring off into space for most of the rest of the film. I can’t say I blame him, actually. The movie didn’t hold up that well with me, either. Sure, some of the songs are good and the overall message is wonderful. But those things didn’t make it any easier to sit through the entire run time.

I know a lot of people love The Wizard of Oz, so my rating is certainly not going to be a popular one. To me the film was too dull in many places, and too overwrought in others. I give this one just 2 stars out of 5.

Plot summary (from the studio): Johnny Depp returns to his iconic role of Captain Jack Sparrow in an action-packed adventure that finds him crossing paths (and swords) with the enigmatic Angelica (Penélope Cruz). When she forces him aboard the Queen Anne’s Revenge, the ship of the legendary pirate Blackbeard (Ian McShane), Jack finds himself on an unexpected journey to the fabled Fountain of Youth. Along the way Jack must use all his wiles to deal with the barbarous Blackbeard and his crew of zombies, Angelica, the ravishing “pirate” with whom he shares a dubious past, and the beautiful, enchanting mermaids whose masterful cunning can lure even the most seasoned sailor to his doom.

Warning: Spoilers below!

Liked:

  • I’m not a Johnny Depp fan, but I’ll admit that Captain Jack Sparrow has grown on me a bit. He was the only character I connected to in this film and the only reason to watch, IMO.
  • The mermaids were an interesting addition. I was definitely freaked out by their “scary” faces.

Disliked:

  • This just didn’t feel like part of the “Pirates” franchise. There were so many new characters and the absence of Will and Elizabeth was definitely noticeable. Sure, they had become a bit tiresome and it would have been hard to shoehorn them in, but at least that would have provided the continuity that was lacking.
  • I don’t understand the fuss about Geoffrey Rush as Barbossa. I don’t like him or the character, and didn’t think he added anything to the film.
  • Speaking of not adding anything, I disliked Penelope Cruz here. Actually, I dislike her everywhere else too, so I guess it’s not surprising that she made the movie suck for me.
  • The film was long and boring. I expected it to be long, like the rest of the series, but I didn’t think I’d fall asleep twice due to lack of action. Ugh!

Rating:

I have to believe that Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides made a billion dollars worldwide solely because of the star power of Johnny Depp. There’s no way people saw this for the plot, humor, action, or any of the supporting cast, so kudos to Depp for being such a massive international star. I give this one 2 stars out of 5.

Plot summary (from the studio): When California girl Susan Murphy is unexpectedly clobbered by a meteor full of outer space gunk, she mysteriously grows to 49-feet-11-inches tall and is instantly labeled as a “monster” named Ginormica. The military jumps into action, and she is captured and held in a secret government compound. The world learns that the military has been quietly rounding up other monsters over the years. This ragtag group consists of the brilliant but insect-headed Dr. Cockroach, PhD; the macho half-ape, half-fish The Missing Link; the gelatinous and indestructible B.O.B.; and the 350-foot grub called Insectosaurus. Their confinement time is cut short, however, when a mysterious alien robot lands on Earth and begins storming the country.

As a last resort, under the guidance of General W.R. Monger (on a desperate order from the President), the motley crew of monsters is called into action to combat the aliens and save the world from imminent destruction.

Warning: Spoilers below!

Liked:

  • I thought B.O.B. was the best character by far. The animation was fantastic, and it seemed that he was always doing something funny in the background of each scene he appeared in. Also, Seth Rogen’s voice was perfect here. Rogen just sounds like a dumb, fat blob, so it fit. (That was meant to be a compliment. Really.)
  • Kiefer Sutherland’s work as the army general was pretty good, too. I was definitely entertained by his stereotypical, gung-ho, over-the-top take on a “war monger.”
  • Derek Dietl was the kind of character you enjoy rooting against. His perfect hair and too-polished smile reminded me of some guy on an infomercial trying to sell the best mattresses los angeles has to offer — but I guess weatherman was a good fit as well!

Disliked:

  • The story was very boring, IMO. It didn’t seem like the stakes were very high, since the villain seemed only to want whatever substance infiltrated Ginormica’s body. It’s not like he was out to destroy the Earth or anything, so it didn’t matter one way or the other if he succeeded.
  • The final battle with the Monsters vs. Aliens was the most anticlimactic I’ve ever seen! The Monsters were just given their weapons, and all it took to blow up the ship was some incredibly stupid dance routine from Dr. House Cockroach.
  • Susan would rather be Ginormica and hobnob with a cockroach, reptile, giant butterfly, and gelatinous blob than be a normal human? Uhhh, okay.

Rating:

I usually go a little easier when rating animated family films than when rating ordinary films, but I just can’t give Monsters vs. Aliens the benefit of the doubt. The title and concept sound exciting, but the execution is simply terrible. There’s no real action in the movie and no significant motivation driving the characters. Even my 8-year-old was bored out of his mind. I give this one 2 stars out of 5.

Plot summary (from the studio): A mysterious event from Earth’s past threatens to ignite a war so big that the Transformers alone will not be able to save the planet. Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) and the Autobots must fight against the darkness to defend our world from the Decepticons’ all-consuming evil.

Warning: Spoilers below!

Liked:

  • I usually can’t stand Shia LaBeouf because he has “douche” written all over him. But he’s actually pretty funny as Sam Witwicky, particularly in the scenes with his parents. I hate to admit it, but he was pretty much the only good thing about this whole movie.
  • Frances McDormand was a nice addition to the cast, and I had to lol a little bit when the John Turturro character just kissed her and she had him arrested. That was cute/funny.

Disliked:

  • Patrick Dempsey CANNOT act! Ugh, he was horrible in this and makes me wonder how it’s possible that Grey’s Anatomy is still on the air with him in a leading role. He might have been “McDreamy” once upon a time, but he’s just gross and annoying now.
  • The last, what, 30 or 40 minutes of the film was nothing but action/fighting/chase scenes? That kind of stuff is pretty tiresome to watch after a while. When the robots battled each other, I couldn’t tell which hunk of steel or which corrugated metal hose belonged to which “character”. It was just a convoluted mess. Plus, whenever action sequences continue unabated for so long like that, it merely serves to emphasize how little plot there is in the film.
  • Speaking of “plot,” did the one in Dark of the Moon make sense to anyone? No? Okay, glad it wasn’t just me!

Rating:

Obviously I didn’t go into Transformers: Dark of the Moon expecting a cinematic masterpiece that would be dissected and discussed by film students for decades to come, but I was hoping for a bit more than the hot mess the movie turned out to be. I give it 2 stars out of 5, and am glad I only paid $1.75 for it at the bargain theater!

Nov 182011

Plot summary (from the studio): An international traveler reaches into the snack bowl at an airport bar before passing her credit card to a waiter. A business meeting begins with a round of handshakes. A man coughs on a crowded bus….

One contact. One instant. And a lethal virus is transmitted.

When Beth Emhoff (Gwyneth Paltrow) returns to Minneapolis from business in Hong Kong, what she thought was jet lag takes a virulent turn. Two days later, she’s dead in the ER and the doctors tell her shocked and grieving husband (Matt Damon) they have no idea why.

Soon, others exhibit the same mysterious symptoms: hacking coughs and fever, followed by seizure, brain hemorrhage…and ultimately, death. In Minneapolis, Chicago, London, Paris, Tokyo, and Hong Kong, the numbers quickly multiply: one case becomes four, then sixteen, then hundreds, thousands, as the contagion sweeps across all borders, fueled by the countless human interactions that make up the course of an average day.

A global pandemic explodes.

At the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, researchers mobilize to break the code of a unique biological pathogen as it continues to mutate. Deputy Director Cheever (Laurence Fishburne) tries to allay the growing panic despite his own personal concerns, and must send a brave young doctor (Kate Winslet) into harm’s way. At the same time, amid a rising tide of suspicion over a potential vaccine—and who gets it first—Dr. Leonora Orantes (Marion Cotillard) of the World Health Organization works through the network of connections that could lead back to the source of what they’re dealing with.

As the death toll escalates and people struggle to protect themselves and their loved ones in a society breaking down, one activist blogger (Jude Law) claims the public isn’t getting the truth about what’s really going on, and sets off an epidemic of paranoia and fear as infectious as the virus itself.

Warning: Spoilers below!

Liked:

  • I tend to like movies with ensemble casts made up of famous faces. This helps me keep everyone straight, even when there is outright character overload, such as in this film.
  • I liked that the film jumped right into the story without a long preamble and without wasting 14 minutes establishing characters and their routines.
  • There was no miracle cure here. The vaccine took a good, long time to develop, which is what would most likely happen in real life.

Disliked:

  • Since most of the big “action” happened off screen, it was hard to get emotionally involved in this movie. I mean, the virus was supposed to have caused a “global pandemic”, yet we saw no real signs of death and destruction. After Paltrow, the boy, and Winslet, most of the deaths were off screen. The vaccine was developed off screen, too, which means there was nothing to watch except random scenes of people acting like lunatics.
  • WTF was up with Jude Law’s teeth in this film??? Either that was an ill-conceived look on the part of the makeup department, or he has become a meth-head since his last film. Whatever the case, it was distracting as hell.
  • When did Matt Damon get so pudgy? He wasn’t outright fat, exactly, but man did he look big. What happened to that chiseled Jason Bourne look? He can obviously afford the best weight loss pill available, so why not use it??
  • Kate Winslet’s character was a total waste. She was one of the best of the ensemble, so why have her make an inglorious exit so early on?
  • The previews really should not have made this look like an action film. I thought Matt Damon was somehow going to run around and try to find the cure in the nick of time, but obviously that wasn’t the point of this movie at all. Yes, this was much more realistic in terms of how governments, the WHO, and the CDC would handle an actual pandemic, but it sure as hell made for a boring two hours.
  • There was absolutely ZERO tension in this film. There wasn’t even a ticking bomb (so to speak), despite the fact that there was a deadly pandemic sweeping across the globe. No one seemed in a particular hurry to get anything done and there was NEVER a sense of urgency. What a waste.
  • Because there were so many characters, I didn’t relate to or care about any of them. I thought Matt Damon was going to be the main guy, but that wasn’t really the case. If he had more significantly more screen time than anyone else, it didn’t feel like it. Plus, we knew he was immune from very early on. The rest of the film basically consisted of him staying in his house until his daughter could get the vaccine. Yawn.

Rating:

Even though I was expecting a different kind of film, I still resolved to give Contagion a fair shake due to all the great actors that appeared in it. However, not even the ensemble cast of Damon, Paltrow, Winslet, Law, Laurence Fishburne, Elliott Gould, Enrico Colantoni (aka Keith Mars), Bryan Cranston, and Marion Cotillard could sustain my interest through this snoozefest. I give the movie 2 stars out of 5.

Plot summary (from the studio): Elizabeth Halsey (Cameron Diaz) is a foulmouthed, ruthless, and inappropriate teacher. She drinks, gets high, and can’t wait to marry a meal ticket to get out of her bogus day job. When she’s dumped by her fiancé, she sets her sights on a rich, handsome substitute (Justin Timberlake) while shrugging off the advances of the school gym teacher (Jason Segel). The consequences of her wild and outrageous schemes give her students, coworkers, and even herself an education like no other!

Warning: Spoilers below!

Liked:

  • I thought Jason Segel was the best part of the entire movie. He is kind of annoying as Marshall these days on How I Met Your Mother, but he’s usually pretty likable in his film roles. His turn as the funny, competent gym teacher — the only sane one at the school — gets a thumbs up from me.
  • I liked that the movie was only 88 minutes long and didn’t have any extraneous scenes. There’s something to be said for films that get right to the point and stay on topic.

Disliked:

  • What kind of message were the screenwriters sending here??? I know, I shouldn’t expect a “dark comedy” to have a good message, but why did everything work out for Ms. Halsey? We learned that if you lie, cheat, and steal, you end up with the nice guy at the end. Meanwhile, if you do your job the right way and try to keep others on the straight and narrow (like Ms. Squirrel did), you deserve to be ridiculed and fired. WTF???
  • Justin Timberlake’s character was kind of funny at first, but then he just ended up being creepy in a totally unfunny way. The writers could have gone in many different directions with him, but I think they made the wrong choice.
  • Why would Mr. Gettis (the Segel character) even want Ms. Halsey after seeing all the stuff she did on the job, to the students, and with Timberlake’s character? That made no sense to me.
  • I know Ms. Halsey becoming a guidance counselor at the school was supposed to be funny, but again that simply made no sense. That’s a step up from teaching in terms of authority and pay, and she did absolutely NOTHING to warrant a promotion. I guess it’s too much to ask that a comedy feature plot points that are remotely plausible.

Rating:

I actually hadn’t heard many reviews about Bad Teacher, so I didn’t have any expectations one way or the other before seeing this. Although there are some funny parts, Elizabeth Halsey is so totally unlikable and lacks any kind of redeeming quality that it was hard to watch her get everything she wanted. I give this film 2 stars out of 5.

Warning: Spoilers ahead! Unlike a lot of people, I was never particularly enthralled as a child with the book Where the Wild Things Are. I just didn’t get why it was supposed to be so good. Maybe it’s because I’m a girl or because I never acted out like Max or because I simply didn’t have that kind of imagination. Whatever the reason, the book never spoke to me. My son sort of likes it, though, so he wanted to see the film. We finally got around to renting it recently.

But you know what? This is just not the kind of story that plays well on the silver screen. The single biggest problem for me was the kid who played Max. He seemed far too old to be having such massive tantrums and doing childish things like standing on the table even after his mother told him to get down. I mean, really? He looked like he was 10. What 10-year-old acts that way? One that has anger management issues, probably — and that’s all I could think about during the whole movie. In the book, I got that Max was a boy with a very vivid imagination that he employed to help himself escape the drudgery of being grounded in his room. But in the film, I kept thinking, wow, this boy has severe problems and needs professional intervention. I have a feeling that’s not the effect the filmmaker was going for.

Nothing else really captured my attention in the film. None of the creatures was interesting to me, nor was Max’s various relationships with them when he was on the island. I was basically bored out of my mind the whole time.

As for my 8-year-old, his favorite scenes were the ones that were lifted directly from the book. In fact, he sat with the book open on his lap while watching, and pointed excitedly whenever he recognized a scene. Otherwise, he was pretty restless and bored too. It took us a few sittings to get through this one.

Overall, I thought this movie was a big waste of time and money. There was nothing at all redeeming about it, IMO. I give it 2 stars out of 5 — and that’s only because I somehow managed to watch the whole thing.

Plot summary (from the studio): It’s off to the exotic desert locale of Abu Dhabi for Carrie and the girls in this riotous comedy sequel. With marriage, kids and career throwing their share of roadblocks at them, Carrie, Samantha, Charlotte and Miranda do the only thing they can do to stop the madness: jet off for an unforgettable week of passion, luxury and unexpected temptation, Arabian-style!

Warning: Spoilers below!

Liked:

  • I enjoyed Miranda and Charlotte’s conversation about the trials of motherhood when they were sitting at the bar in their suite. It was great to see Charlotte finally break down and have a real conversation for once instead of spouting all her Pollyanna platitudes all the time.
  • The return of Smith Jerrod. Say what you will about the character or the actor (Jason Lewis), I think he’s great. He was always my favorite of Samantha’s many, many men, and I definitely wanted them to be together. I wish Smith had more screen time in this film.
  • Seeing some of the bazaars in Abu Dhabi was fun (at least until Adrian appeared and ruined everything). I wonder if they have guys selling iphone covers in deserted alleyways like in most downtown areas over here!

Disliked:

  • Carrie has turned into such an insufferable character that I can barely watch when she’s front and center. From her ridiculous tuxedo and “crown” combination at Stanford’s wedding to her incredibly selfish reaction to Big’s anniversary gift (“A piece of jewelry would have been nice” — really??!!), she was just a drag the entire time.
  • Big’s response to the news that Carrie cheated was to buy her a huge diamond??? Wow, talk about feeding the beast. How totally ridiculous.
  • The Abu Dhabi setting seemed all wrong. There was absolutely no reason to have the women go there, except of course as a ploy to play up the “fish out of water” aspect. I hated how Samantha acted over there. She didn’t come off as the liberated, sexually confident woman she wanted to appear to be; instead, she came off as a loud, boorish American tourist with absolutely zero respect of foreign customs, culture, and law.
  • The “chase” scene near the end where the mob of men is supposedly after the women (for what, exactly? What were the men going to do?) was pretty dumb. Meeting the fashion-obsessed Middle Eastern women and then escaping in burkas was yet another ridiculous scene in a film full of them.
  • How did the women manage to retain their first-class seats for the trip home? The hotel owner provided them, didn’t he? And seeing as how he unceremoniously kicked them out of their hotel suite, it didn’t make sense that he would allow them to keep their first-class berths on the plane. Wouldn’t he have banned them altogether or made them buy their own tickets?
  • Speaking of airplane tickets, how utterly diva-ish was it of Samantha to whine about the “horror” of possibly having to fly economy class for the trip home. A one-off comment might have been funny and in keeping with the character. But the repeated whining and fretting came off as a bit insulting to the 99% of the population who will NEVER be able to fly first-class on an international trip.

Rating:

I rented Sex and the City 2 looking for some lighthearted entertainment. I wasn’t expecting anything spectacular out of a movie like this, but even so I found the result to be terrible. The women in this movie were barely recognizable as the characters from the groundbreaking television series. Obviously characters change over time; in this case, the change happens to have been for the worse. I give this film 2 stars out of 5.

Plot summary (from the studio): Johnny Depp stars as an American tourist whose playful dalliance with a stranger leads to a web of intrigue, romance, and danger in The Tourist.

During an impromptu trip to Europe to mend a broken heart, Frank (Depp) unexpectedly finds himself in a flirtatious encounter with Elise (Angelina Jolie), an extraordinary woman who deliberately crosses his path.

Against the breathtaking backdrop of Paris and Venice, their whirlwind romance quickly evolves as they find themselves unwittingly thrust into a deadly game of cat and mouse.

Warning: Spoilers below!

Liked:

  • I thought Venice was the best part of this film. I have always been intrigued by the city, so it was nice to see it featured so prominently here.
  • Paul Bettany was pretty good in this movie. I haven’t really liked him in anything else (he usually plays the bad guy, doesn’t he?), but thought he delivered a solid performance despite the subpar material he had to work with.

Disliked:

  • Angelina Jolie drove me absolutely INSANE!!! I cannot stand that knowing smirk she wears on her face all the time, as if she’s constantly thinking to herself, “I’m the sexiest woman in the world! Everyone’s looking at ME!” Ugh. She is bony and gaunt, and needs to eat a cheeseburger or three so we can’t count all the bones in her body the next time she’s on screen. Oh, and she should learn to walk like a normal person, too. What the hell was up with that floaty, “I’m a goddess incarnate” prance she used in every single scene????
  • The plot was ridiculous. If you didn’t know Johnny Depp was Alexander Pearce from the moment the opening credits splashed across the screen, then this must have been your first movie ever. There was absolutely zero suspense in this filmat all.
  • Speaking of zero, that’s the amount of chemistry I detected between Depp and Jolie. Sorry, but I just don’t understand how so many women find him attractive, what with his pudgy face, stringy hair, and stuttering, bumbling manner. Yeah, I realize that last aspect was part of the tourist “act” he adopted to throw off the cops, but still… ewww. 21 Jump Street Depp, Finding Neverland Depp, The Astronaut’s Wife Depp — when he’s clean and groomed like in those films, yes, he’s sexy. But here??? Um, no.
  • I didn’t understand the money plot at all. So Alexander Pearce stole a billion and a half dollars from that gangster, right? And the gangster presumably got the money the way most gangsters do, by running drugs, hookers, or weapons. So where does the whole Interpol tax complaint come in???? Gangsters don’t pay taxes!!! While the initial crime itself might be on Interpol’s radar because of the sheer size of the theft, I doubt they’d go charging in to collect taxes.

Rating:

I knew of The Tourist’s terrible reviews and disappointing worldwide box office returns before seeing the film, so I guess I only have myself to blame for wasting my time here. Angelina Jolie and Johnny Depp banked on their star power to carry the dumb plot instead of actually trying to act, but that didn’t work out too well. I give this one 2 stars out of 5.

Jul 052011

Plot summary (from the studio): A sexy, stylish thriller, Slow Burn stars Ray Liotta as Ford Cole, a big-city district attorney with his eye on the mayor’s office and a big problem on his hands. One of his deputies, the beautiful assistant district attorney Nora Timmer (Jolene Blalock), has just confessed to killing a man in what she claims was self-defense. A bad situation gets worse when an enigmatic stranger named Luther Pinks (LL Cool J) turns up at the police station to contradict Nora’s story and paint a very different picture of Ford’s talented colleague. With his career and perhaps his life on the line, has a mere handful of hours to sort the truth from the lies in a saga involving Nora, a record store clerk (Mekhi Phifer), and a powerful gang lord.

Warning: Spoilers Below!

Liked:

  • I thought this movie had the potential to be engrossing and intriguing. The set-up was pretty good (albeit reminiscent of some better films) and main plot was interesting. I knew Nora was bad right from the start, but I couldn’t guess exactly what her angle was. This was the main thing that kept me watching.

Disliked:

  • Some of the acting was pretty bad. I mean, this felt like a straight-to-DVD movie at times, even though it was actually a Lions Gate film and had a regular (though short-lived) theatrical release.
  • I thought the whole race angle was kind of dumb. So Nora was actually white but just passed herself off as black to get ahead? Meh, big deal. How much of an impact did her race really have on the actual story/crime? Not a whole heck of a lot, so why even bring that up? That’s the kind of thing that could have been explored in an entirely separate film, not tacked on to one that already had a lot going on.
  • I appreciate a good twist as much as the next viewer, but at the end, it just seemed like the writers were throwing as many in as they could possibly fit. Seriously, it was one after the other in quick succession, making it hard to process what was happening on the screen. Instead of going, “Wow, that was great!” I just sat back and said, “Oh, right…” and rolled my eyes.

Rating:

I wasn’t expecting much out of Slow Burn, so it would be unfair to say I was disappointed in the result. Instead, I’ll just say that the movie wasn’t worth the 93 minutes I spent on it, and recommend that you not bother watching. I give it 2 stars out of 5.

© 2010 Reviews and More Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha